I’m taking off my pants

If you’ve ever attempted to write a fictional story, you’ve probably heard or seen something of the “pantsers versus plotters” debate. If you haven’t, it’s the discussion around writing by the seat of your pants (I’d love to know where that expression came from) and planning out your story ahead of time. Which is better? Does one method produce better stories than the other? Does being a pantser mean you’re disorganized? Does being a plotter mean you’re neurotic?

Most people who take on this subject come to the happy conclusion that writers should do whatever feels right to them. “Whatever is comfortable for you,” they say. “Whatever helps your creative juices flow. There’s no right way to tell a story.”

Now, I’m a pantser. My best friend is a plotter. I work from the inside out, starting with one detail or one moment and building a world around it as I go along. She works from the outside in, building her world and then filling in the details. One of these methods is obviously more logical (hint: it’s not mine), but I was pleased with the idea that we were both right so I wasn’t going to mess with it. Until now.

I participated in NaNoWriMo in 2011 and that was the ultimate “pantsing” experience. I had the barest thread of a story line and one vivid image in my mind, but I was determined to get a novel out of it. I had never written a novel before (apparently all the cop-offs of The Black Stallion I wrote when I was eight years old don’t count) or anything of length, for that matter. I was convinced I could overcome my experience handicap with talent and determination.

When I finished, I had 81,284 words of…something. It had a beginning, middle, and end, some characters and some conflict, but to call it a novel would be akin to ranking Twilight up with The Lord of the Rings. I told myself it wasn’t anything some good editing couldn’t fix.

“You just have to get organized,” I murmured feverishly, trying to imagine how character A got from point B to what I thought was point J but couldn’t know for sure because, as a pantser, I didn’t plot points. “Maybe it’s time to try an outline. Just a rough outline.”

This was the result.


Yes, I know that’s a small, low-quality image and you can’t see what’s actually written there. Even if you could read it, it wouldn’t make any sense, and even without reading individual words you can see that looks nothing like an outline. It doesn’t look like a chart. It doesn’t look like anything.

I was overwhelmed. To say it was like herding cats would be an understatement. It was like herding cats, turtles, and bald eagles at the same time. It was like dropping a zoo into a vat of toxic waste and trying to fit the product into Noah’s Ark.

“I am the writer!” I shouted, frantically scooping up plot points as they tried to slip under the door. “This is my world! I control everything! I am in charge!”

“Sure you are,” said character D, who was swinging from my mother’s hanging potted geranium. “Have you figured out my motivation? What’s my back story?”

“Excuse me,” said character arc Q, who was sitting in the corner and trying to be good. “Do you know what makes me happen yet?”

I’m not going to make any blanket statements like “it’s fine to be a pantser but if someone threatens to burn down your house if you don’t write an outline, you ought to be able to do it.” There are people who are good at pantsing. There are smart people who write character-driven stories rather than mutant plot-monstrosities via the pantsing method. Can you imagine if J.K. Rowling had pantsed Harry Potter? Wait…that’s not what I mean…

Anyway. The lesson I learned from this is that I am not a good pantser. If I had planned that first novel, I might’ve realized the story had too many legs and tails and not enough eyes. I might’ve realized my secondary characters were doing all the work and my protagonist was reclining on a bed of lilies. But I did learn my lesson.

I’m starting a new project and I am plotting the pants off it. Every character has a physical description, back story, socioeconomic status, internal and external conflicts, and favorite ice cream flavor (that last one is a lie). My outline even has Roman numerals. It’s slow going, but I’d rather get it all down now than read the draft later and discover character B’s brother is long dead, dying slowly, and alive all in the same week. I’d rather not send the draft to my friends to read only to realize I never put in the really important thing that makes all that stuff happen. I feel much more confident and surprisingly comfortable now that I’m plotting. Maybe it’s not my first instinct, but I think it will be good for me.

Are you a pantser? Are you a plotter? Are you some combination of the two (which most of us probably are)? Have you ever had mutinous plots and characters rampaging through your house? I’d love to hear about it.


6 comments on “I’m taking off my pants

  1. Chris says:

    I’m about 95% pantser and 5% plotter. I may get an idea in my head, and then I come up with the same things for every outline: Main character, secondary character, setting, conflict. After that, everything else just happens as I write. More secondary characters come in, and the conflict may shift and change, but it’s still pretty much the same story when the first draft is finished.Then I start on my second draft and do some basic fixing up, and then it’s off to the beta readers.

    And I guess it depends on at what age J.K. Rowling pantsed Harry Potter. I imagine poor little “Sorcerer’s Stone” Harry would just cry.

  2. I’m 75% plotter and pantser the other 25%. I usually start with an idea and just start writing. If things start to come together, then I’ll sit down and draft an outline – bare bones. I outline the major milestones and the conflict and then I go from there. Rigid outlines don’t really work for me because I like the flexibility for the characters to change their minds.

  3. b.h.quinn says:

    I am a plotter when it comes to my novels and series and a pantser when it comes to short stories. My short stories (as they often do) revolve around a single event, so at the most I have a list of things that have to happen. On the other hand, my novels and book series tend to be complicated like the Potter series is, so I need to have a good outline.

    A good place to start if you’re having difficulty nailing down a story is the Snowflake Method. You pare it down to the most basic of plots and slowly build it up. I’ve used it several times to great success. Good luck on your planning.

  4. Reblogueó esto en Silvia Altamirano!y comentado:
    I’m definitely a pantser!

  5. DebE says:

    Hello, my name is Deb E, and I am a bumbler… I, er, mean pantster who turns to outlining when things start to fall apart. Basically, I pants to find the story, then when I’m right attached to it, but know it’s not working, I outline until it, or some reasonable version of it, works… There, I admitted it. I stumble through the dark and only light a torch once I’m right lost…

  6. Carly says:

    I think everyone who’s commented has a much better handle on what works for them than I do. The general consensus seems to be plot as necessary, pants the rest? The snowflake method is definitely something I should try. And Deb E, at least you could make things work once you started outlining; when I finally “lit the torch” all the dinosaurs were loose and I had to abandon Jurassic Park.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s